We are often asked for examples of all of the platforms that are built on top of PubSweet. As some are in progress, and all are unique, it’s often a complex inquiry to respond to. In this post, we attempt to share high-level information about each platform.

Hindawi

Journals publishing and technology organization Hindawi Ltd. has developed a manuscript submission and peer review platform currently in live use. In addition to this, they’ve begun work on additional tools using PubSweet.

Submission and Peer Review – this platform is live for a low volume journal, with 20 succesful live submissions so far, and one accepted article which has gone through the entire process and is now being prepared for publication.

Hindawi Ltd. will make the platform multi-tenanted, to roll out across subsequent journals. They are leading the charge in the Coko community on the multi-tenancy approach.

In addition to submission and peer review, and multi-tenancy, Hindawi Ltd. are also building a QA platform on top of PubSweet. All of the code is open and available to be reused.

It took less than one year for Hindawi Ltd. to develop and begin live use of their platform. They were the first PubSweet Community member to launch with live submissions. After gaining this experience, they decided to add development resource, now with 18 people working on different PubSweet developments for the organization.

eLife

eLife Sciences chose to begin their development by working toward incremental replacement of a previous system. The first phase is represented by early release of a submission workflow. Today, 60% of all submissions go through their PubSweet submission component. From here, the submission flows into a legacy proprietary system for Peer Review. Interestingly, the content is transferred between the two systems using a MECA bundle, representing the first live use of MECA. Because eLife is building modularly within the community, their MECA component is, of course, is open source and available to anyone building a PubSweet platform.

It took just over one year for eLife to deliver this first critical component to their much larger end-to-end workflow strategy underpinned by PubSweet.

Looking forward, eLife’s workflow will be a series of inter-connected PubSweet apps. Any of these apps could be reused by anyone building with PubSweet. Within the community there are a variety of approaches to similar problems, and the multiple app proposition is one example of this. They will name each standalone app with the prefix Libero (eg Libero Publisher, Libero Review etc).

EBI

The EBI (European Bioinformatics Institute) platform is a multiple source post-publish QA system for content aggregation (pushing to EuropePMC). It supports manual input through a submission wizard, as well as batch FTP upload/submission. Although built specifically for their workflow, it is conceivable the platform could be used for any workflow requiring post acceptance/production QA. It will go live in May.

Interesting features include annotations using Nick Stennings Annotator, to QA XML. They are also using Coko’s XSweet for docx to HTML conversion. EBI have built this extremely fast, in a matter of months, with a development team of around four developers.

EBI generously hosts most of the PubSweet Community meetings, and of course make all work available Open Source.

Editoria

Editoria the fully fledged post-acquisition book production workflow developed by the Coko team in collaboration with the University of California Press (UCP) and the California Digital Library. Editoria is now in live use by UCP, ATLA Press, punctum books, M Publishing, UNC Press/Longleaf Services and Book Sprints.

There is a healthy community evolving around the product, as well as a forthcoming hosting vendor agreement (stay tuned). Editoria is completely open source. Our team of two developers works on the core Editoria platform, however much more horsepower is added when you consider development done on CSS stylesheets, paged.js, XSweet (docx to HTML conversion) and Wax (editor).

More on Editoria here.

Micropublications

WormBase commissioned the Coko team to develop a micropublications platform for their micropublications.org project. It follows a simple micropubs workflow which has been designed and built to allow for its re-purposing by any micropubs use case. The real key difference between a journals workflow and micropubs is the scope of material submitted and the intention to process it very quickly.

This platform has been in active development for a year. It is likely that the platform will be in live use this year. Everything developed for Wormbase is fully open source, created currently by one (extremely productive) Coko developer.

Aperture

Another ‘micropubs’ platform possibility being explored for the Organization of Human Brain Mapping. Early development is just beginning, and comes in response to a workflow sprint Coko co-founder Adam Hyde facilitated with key stakeholders last year. Most interesting is their desire to publish living entities, such as Jupyter Notebooks. Of course, all work will be Open Source.

Pre-Review

Built by Pre-Review, specifically by Coko friend Rik Smith-Unna, this is a preprint review system built to replace the current system. All work is being made available open source.

Digital Science

Digital Science‘s Innovations Team is building a very interesting awards system using PubSweet. In a broader sense, their strategy within the community is to build a system with configurable workflows. The functionality would allow a user to design a workflow, export, and access a PubSweet app that is automatically compiled to suit.

All work is open source, and so far there is one developer working on these projects.

xPub-Collabra

xPub-collabra is a journal platform Coko development team developed with Dan Morgan, formerly of the UCP Collabra Psychology journal. For one year, Coko has invested one developer’s time in the platform, however have decided to pause development to accelerate other efforts.

Our platform development team is small and we need to maximize resources, since eLife and Hindawi Ltd. have quality journal offerings in the mix, we have less urgency to develop this platform. Still, we aren’t abandoning it. One interesting avenue is to collaborate with organizations with development resources to finish this off. If that sounds like you, please give us a call.

And…

There are a number of projects at an embryonic stage. These include a pre-acquisition monograph workflow, emergency medicine workflow, and some others

PubSweet has been in development for three years, and our surrounding community began coalescing just a year ago. Already, we count nine platforms being built covering a variety of fascinating use cases. Three platforms are now in live use. Two were developed in under a year.

Needless to say, watch this space!